Motifiti
2010 Volkswagen Polo vs 2004 Mitsubishi Airtrek Turbo R 4g63t
Side by side on everything we can count. We do not inspect cars, so nothing here says which one is the better buy.
| Measure | 2010 Volkswagen Polo Makumbi | 2004 Mitsubishi Airtrek Turbo R 4g63t Boniel |
|---|---|---|
| Price Asking price. We do not inspect cars or check what they are worth. | KES 850,000 | KES 850,000 |
| Against the typical one on Motifiti Half of that model is priced above the typical figure and half below. | Exactly typical | Not enough listed to say |
| Year | 2010 ✓ | 2004 |
| Mileage | 130,000 km ✓ | 156,000 km |
| Fuel economy An estimate for this model, not a measurement of this car. | 12.5 km/l ✓ | 10.0 km/l |
| Engine | 1380cc | 2000cc |
| Fuel | Petrol | Petrol |
| Transmission | automatic | automatic |
| Condition | Kenyan Used | Kenyan Used |
| Body | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
The 2010 Volkswagen Polo comes out ahead on 3 of these, the 2004 Mitsubishi Airtrek Turbo R 4g63t on 0. Which of those matter is your call. Winning three small measures does not outweigh losing one big one.
Prices are what sellers are asking, not valuations. We do not inspect vehicles or verify their condition, mileage or paperwork. Always view a car and have it checked before you pay anything.